Pages

15 Apr 2021

On the Life, Death, and Shameful Blacklisting of Lynne Frederick


 Lynne Frederick (1954 - 1994)
 Portrait by Terry Fincher (c. 1974)


I. 
 
Let's get straight to the point: the treatment that the English actress Lynne Frederick received, following the death of her husband Peter Sellers in 1980, was shameful. 
 
The abuse and ridicule meted out by the press and public was bad enough; but the behavior of the Hollywood set who, in a display of grotesque moral hypocrisy and spitefulness, blacklisted her was even worse - but then there's no people like show people ... [1]
 
 
II. 
 
Lynne Frederick was born in Middlesex, in July 1954. Her parents separated when she was just two years old and she never knew her father or had any connections with his side of the family. Her mother was a casting director for Thames Television. Raised in Leicestershire, she was later schooled in London and had ambitions of becoming a science teacher.  

However, when Frederick was fifteen fate - in the form of actor and film director Cornel Wilde, a famous friend of her mother's unfairly described by some as a poor man's Tony Curtis - intervened and put the teenager on the road to stardom. Wilde had been searching for a young unknown to star in his movie adaptation of the best-selling sci-fi novel The Death of Grass (1956). 
 
Wilde was instantly besotted with the beautiful and charismatic teen and so, despite Frederick having no previous acting experience, he offered her the role (sans audition). Whilst the film - released in 1970 as No Blade of Grass - received mixed reviews [2], Frederick became an overnight sensation, much loved by the same British public who would turn on her ten years later.          

As well as establishing an acting career that included a number of TV commercials for soap and shampoo, Frederick regularly featured in fashion magazines as a model and cover girl. In one famous spread for Vogue (Sept 1971), she was photographed by Patrick Lichfield. She was, in short, the fresh-faced girl of the moment; young women wanted to be her and men of all ages wanted ... well, we can all imagine what they wanted ...     


III.
 
During the mid-late '70s, Frederick's career as an actress and model continued to develop and she began to evolve a more sophisticated style and image, no longer content to simply play the girl next door or young innocent. Thus, in 1976, for example, she happily took a role in a BBC Play for Today as a sexually enigmatic character who falls for a lesbian artist [3]. She also starred in Pete Walker's slasher-horror movie Schizo, now regarded as a cult classic amongst fans of the genre.   
 
Meanwhile, her A-list Hollywood agent, Dennis Selinger, was preparing Frederick for global stardom in more mainstream film and television, as he had previously done with Susan George. Sadly, however, things were about to go very wrong - both professionally and personally - for Frederick, following her fateful marriage to sociopathic goon Peter Sellers in February 1977. She was 22 and Sellers, who had already married and divorced three wives, was 51.
 
The couple had met at a dinner party the year before, shortly after Frederick had finished making Schizo. He proposed to her two days afterwards, but she sensibly turned him down. However, she not-so-sensibly agreed to date and a year later they married. Initially, things went well and they formed a popular red carpet couple. But things quickly turned sour and rumours began to circulate of drug abuse, infidelity, and domestic violence. As his health deteriorated, Frederick was forced to put her own career on ice in order to look after him.    
 
Whilst they separated several times, Frederick always returned to care for Sellers until he died of a heart attack on 24 July 1980 (the day before her 26th birthday). Although Sellers was reportedly in the process of excluding her from his will shortly before he died, the planned changes were never legally finalised and so Frederick inherited the entire estate, worth an estimated £4.5 million. 

To which I say: Good for her! Unfortunately, that wasn't the reaction of his children from earlier marriages (who only received £800 each); nor was it the reaction of the press and public, or his Hollywood chums. 
 
Accepting unsubstantiated claims made by her stepson, Michael Sellers, it was almost universally decided that Frederick was a deceitful and cunning young woman who had only married for the money and to increase her own fame: the term used over and over again was gold digger - one that is not only derogatory, but misogynistic, as it is invariably applied to young women [4].       

Attempts to restart her film career post-Sellers were unsuccessful; she was effectively blacklisted by Hollywood, although she continued to live (reclusively) in California until her death in 1994, aged 39 [5]
 
Whilst I don't wish to go into details of her tragic final years - which involved seizures, alcoholism, and depression - I'm pleased to say that in the decades since her death, Frederick has gained a posthumous following of loyal fans and that even some of those who had been unfairly critical of her were prepared to concede that she had been poorly treated. 
 
 
Notes
 
[1] Famous names who voiced unfavourable opinions of Frederick include Roger Moore, Spike Milligan, and Britt Ekland. One person who always stood by her, however, was the actor David Niven, whom she had met whilst filming in 1974. Frederick regarded him not only as a close friend, but as a trusted father figure.   
 
[2] No Blade of Grass also generated disquiet amongst some critics due to a controversial abduction and gang rape scene involving Frederick as 16-year-old Mary Custance. The graphic nature of the sexual violence - lasting for several minutes on screen - was regarded as gratuitous at best. Although the rape sequence was cut in length when the film was released on video, the full scene was restored when issued on DVD.    
 
[3] Admittedly, the fact that she married former lover David Frost just a few months after the death of Peter Sellers didn't help matters. Nor did the fact that she divorced Frost after 17 months and then married a Californian heart surgeon shortly afterwards.   
 
[4] To her credit, Frederick was an outspoken advocate for same sex relationships and gay rights in a time when this was not so fashionable or morally and politically de rigeur
 
[5] Frederick was found dead by her mother in her West Los Angeles home on 27 April 1994. Whilst foul play and suicide were quickly ruled out, an autopsy failed to determine the cause of death. 
 
 

22 comments:

  1. But she was cunning and kept the fortune away from Seller's children for herself. You can't write yourself out of that fact.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Lynne Frederick didn't need to be cunning: she was still married to Sellers at the time of his death in July 1980 and had been named by him as the sole benefactor of his estate.

      It's true that she and Sellers had reached a final divorce settlement that would have deprived her of any claim on his estate, but, as I'm sure you know, he died before the document became legally binding.

      Which was bad luck for his children - but fortunate for her ...

      Delete
    2. Yeah, but in the article it states “good for her”. Maybe if it was found in a cave with an unknown owner, but this is at the expense of his own children. Have you really put yourself in their shoes and considered their perspectives and snub? Instead it should go to a short lived marriage of a naturally beautiful person who has vast opportunities for hitting a genetic lottery. Now this windfall too. Good for her??? Sure, he filed the legal paperwork but she didn’t make any moral moves to right a wrong. She’s not free from criticism.

      Delete
    3. Sellers was a terrible father, let's just be clear about that. He did leave each of his children a small amount of money, with the provision that they "stand on their own feet". Did they deserve better? Undoubtedly. However, they weren't kind to Lynne, and she was obeying the instructions in his will. It was probably easier for his kids to blame her rather than their father. Later, they all admitted that he didn't love them, which is terrible. Could she have handled some things differently? Sure, but given how she was being treated, she probably felt that whatever she did, she was damned if she did, and damned if she didn't. And no doubt she endured abuse at the hands of Sellers, who was known to be possessive and jealous. Either way, she did not deserve that treatment. Sellers already had three failed marriages and was old enough to be her father - he had the power, she didn't. Lynne's mother put it best - if she hadn't married Peter Sellers, she probably would have lived longer. The people who criticized Lynne were the same ones who were very vocal about how toxic Sellers was. His son Michael died prematurely, and his sisters have stated that he really died of a broken heart. Peter Sellers was poison for those closest to him.

      Delete
    4. Thanks for this Muirmaiden ...

      Delete
  2. And as a karmic smackdown to Michael Sellers for his selfish manipulation of the narrative to paint himself as the devoted crusader to Right the Wrong inflicted by "gold digger" Lynne and reclaim His birthright as THE True Spokesperson of His Father's Legacy, Michael suffered a fatal heart attack (apparently his first and only one) as a direct result of inheriting old man Peter's notorious health problems.

    Seriously, with Michael using up his adult life writing THREE autobiographies about his Father without ever making something of HIMSELF, the old man may have had a point about insisting his kids "stand on their own feet", as neither sister has apparently made much of their own lives either (particularly the daughter with Britt Ekland, Victoria, who's apparently had some - to put it mildly - serious issues). But what mattered is that they all once put up a united front to vilify a former stepmother for the heinous act of receiving a hefty severance pay for enduring the regular temper-tantrums of an infantile old meanie husband for 3-4 years. All while his kids' insincere suckup visits to "go along to get along" didn't reward them with any mo' money. So I guess it was alright for them to feel a little "superior" for a short time, especially after Lynne Frederick's ignominious death. Shame on those unrepentant overgrown hateful whiny brats, and for the sycophants who sided with them.

    So yeah, Peter Sellers was poison: to EVERYONE around him. Still, it is pretty funny that Lynne's daughter (from her third husband) became the sole beneficiary of his estate despite having NO relation to him and will likely NEVER *share* this wealth with Seller's surviving daughters - EVER.
    So posthumously, Lynne Frederick did have the last word after all. Good for her.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
  3. Gold digging bitch, that's all she was. Good riddance.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. How does inheriting make someone a gold-digger? Never mind that Sellers had a history of being abusive and controlling over his wives, and that Lynne was young enough to be his daughter. That's a major power imbalance.

      Delete
  4. She deprived his children of their inheritance and left it to her ugly brat. Everyone despised her, they can't all be wrong. She stopped him changing his will, another undisputed fact. Shouldn't have said good riddance but she was evil.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sellers did leave a sum of money to each of his children, with the provision that they "stand on their own feet". It was Sellers who did that, he was not a good father in the slightest. She was obeying the instructions in his will, she did not "deprive" them of their inheritance" his will wasn't changed in time, therefore the new will was not valid. That's gow it works.

      Delete
  5. PS he may have been older but she was an adult and had free will. She married him for his money and status. She wasn't exactly a great actress. You lot supporting her are in the minority. He was no angel but she knew what she was doing. Hollywood isn't exactly known for it's morals, if they blacklisted her it was because she was a terrible person and not exactly an asset to the industry.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. She did not have a bad reputation before marrying Sellers, but he did and he knew what he was doing, he wanted a young woman that he could possess and control (his penchant for marrying women who were significantly younger than him was an established pattern, beginning with his second wife Britt Ekland). Frederick's career was taking off but Sellers demanded that she give it up to tend to him 24/7. He was the evil one, they way he treated people throughout his life is evidence of that, and there's no reason to think that Lynne didn't receive abusive treatment. His will not being changed in time was not her fault, and as I said Sellers was a terrible father anyway. Calling women gold-diggers is pure misogyny. The press basically hounded her until she died which is appalling and disgusting.

      Delete
    2. I don't know why I commented. She was hardly anyone of substance. Gold digger can apply to men also. Marrying for money is reprehensible, whatever the gender.

      Delete
    3. "Hardly anyone of substance" - in terms of what, celebrity? She was still relatively new in the business, and there were people who loved her, such as David Niven, a longtime friend of Sellers who stated that Frederick was a good wife to him. In fact, Frederick took care of Sellers and nursed him during most of his illnesses when they were together, making sure he took his medication, and that he was taking care of himself, and many people, even his children admitted that she took good care of him. If she really wanted his money she could have neglected him or worse to ensure that he would die and she would get his money and estate as soon as possible. They were married just over 3 years, and he pursued her, not the other way around. The first time he proposed to her in 1976, she rejected him. And, she did donate some of the money she inherited from him for heart disease research, as that was an aliment that Sellers struggled with in his adult life and ultimately killed him. She continued to love Sellers until the end of her life, even though he mistreated her (read the autobiography of Britt Ekland to get an idea of how he treated his wives). Frederick did not "deprive" Sellers' children of his money; that was all the doing of Sellers, who only left them a small amount (relatively speaking) each, and made it clear that he didn't want to give them any more. That was the will that was legally binding; the second will which did not go through at the time of his death was not legally binding, and that was no one's fault. At the time of his death he was estranged from his daughters, after he poured a drink on Victoria (who was 14 at the time) and when Sarah tried to defend her sister Sellers sent her a nasty letter telling her that he never wanted to see or speak to his daughters again. Supposedly he and his son Michael were starting to mend their relationship but knowing how Sellers had treated him the past (including beating him at age 6 when he accidentally scratched his father's car) it probably would have been short-lived. It's terrible, but again, it's not the fault of Lynne Frederick. He was a terrible father before she was even in the picture.

      I've never seen men referred to as gold-diggers, only women, which is misogynistic.

      Yes Peter Sellers was a celebrity and talented, but he was a bad person. Is celebrity and talent the only thing that makes someone "a person of substance"? If that's the case, that's a very frightening notion about humanity in general.

      Delete
    4. The decent thing would have been for her to share her wealth with them. That could have righted some of the wrongs of their upbringing. Sadly, her daughter is now enjoying the money.

      Delete
    5. If she did, it probably wouldn't have been enough. She was damned of she did, damned if she didn't. Also, his kids didn't treat her very well. A sad situation for all of them, but Peter Sellers was the main cause of it.

      Delete
  6. (From the OCTOBER 13 Anonymous, NOT the Nov. 9-10 reactionary)

    Yeah, this is exactly what I'm talking about. Sellers' kids were all doomed to turn out exactly like HIM: selfish, petty, vindictive, perpetually immature, and obliviously incapable of any accountability or self-reflection of their own reprehensible hurtfulness. And even if Frederick HAD "reconsidered" the distribution of wealth and gave in to Sellers' fair-weather friends' bleating of "Oh, won't someone please think of the children?", it still wouldn't have been enough to dissuade their predisposed suspicion and hatred of her versus their reductive hero-worship of a Beloved Comedy Legend.

    If anything, the sad experience warped Frederick into the paralyzing depression that ended her life all too soon, while Sellers' remaining two kids remain overgrown brats feeling sorry for themselves. And Dr. Strangelove aside, I am so OVER this alleged "genius" of Peter Sellers, who's just not that interesting. In fact, he was just a big meanie. Who never mattered all that much to me.

    ReplyDelete
  7. It's a shame she was smeared. However, those children should have inherited more than £800. Lynne would surely have done herself some good in sharing a bit. Given that she had three marriages too perhaps she wasn't an amazing partner either.

    ReplyDelete
  8. (By the October 13, 2023 Anonymous; not the broken-record "Think of the Children" crybaby apparently incapable of basic comprehension or honest compassion)

    We always end up having the same conversation, don't we?

    I (and this blog's originator) clarify the very obvious, sensible, and logical points about how Mr. Peter Sellers was a deeply disturbed individual whose perpetually untreated mental health issues and disintegrating physical condition were ultimately enabled and excused by a host of fair-weather "friends" and "fans" who were so bowed over by his alleged talent and genius, they wouldn't DARE stick their necks out to make themselves the targets of his infantile temper tantrums by actually calling out his hurtful garbage, much less make themselves "unpopular" by any personal affronts to his character. Only for Sellers to STILL lash out at anyone and everyone anyway with his toxic behavior.

    But at least HE had a good excuse for that: he was a very sick man who couldn't help himself. But his children, the gutter press and all the other suckups who banded together to smear his widow for something that was out of their hands, LEGALLY binding and none of their damned business knew exactly what they were doing. And none of them were crazy, emotionally discombobulated, or acting out of any sense of "moral indignation" to "right a wrong": they were just MEAN, and they got off on it. And somehow, I think all of the mean posters who continue to parrot the party-line of smearing Ms. Frederick as a "gold-digger" do, too. And that's just sick.

    And as a parting thought, consider the cases of Dennis Hopper and Ric Ocasek (the lead singer/songwriter of The Cars) during their respective terminal illnesses and how they dealt with THEIR younger wives. Both Hopper and Ocasek became so paranoid and bitter about losing their precious fortunes to spouses they'd grown sick and tired of, they still had the *sense* to have their slick lawyers make all the proper arrangements to protect their clients' wealth according to their "wishes" (assuming the cancer treatment medications didn't warp their minds' so much to invalidate their decision-making). Thus, neither wife got a dime after both geezers expired, and have largely been forgotten. But at least they haven't been vilified; hell, they might actually be pitied, except for the press's still-ridiculous favoritism for dead old celebrities' who've long been known to be difficult and unpleasant but always get a free pass for their "talent" and "genius". And in all honesty, I just don't dig Easy Rider. At all. And Ben Orr (also RIP) was always the Cars' better vocalist.

    Now imagine, if you will, that Sellers actually got his $#!+ together to fix his will (time that would've been better spent than making that stupid Fu Manchu movie) and DID cut out Lynne Frederick after all, but *still* stiffed his kids with peanuts. Then there would've been NO one to blame and Frederick would've been free and clear to rebuild her life (and career) without any of the baggage and resentment that the inheritance burdened her with.

    But instead, another valuable young life and potential talent was maliciously snuffed out. And for what? For a little bit of money. There's more to life than a little money, you know. Don't you know that? I don't understand it.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Is the article writer in love or what..
    Poor Lynne she disowned her own mother for years.her and old ugly Sellers deserved one another,poor Lynne...The cult of celebrity is alive and well

    ReplyDelete
  10. Well, Amber Heard is not so much the first female celebrity who was cancelled. Both were subjected to abuse from their famous husbands and a smear campaigns from fanatics and tabloids. Hell, even "mutual abuse" stuff is similar (deserved one another, both abusive each other).
    The history repeats itself.

    ReplyDelete