Nick Land (Gargoyle Philosopher)
Immanuel Kant (Architect of the Cathedral)
I.
According to Nick Land [1], the dominant faith of the modern world is Universalism ...
Which is ironic, because if you examine the idea closely - historically - you'll discover that it's a very particular way of looking at the world that merely "asserts its own universal significance whilst ascending to a state of general dominance that approaches the universal".
In other words, Universalism - which determines the direction and meaning of modernity - is revealed "as the minutely determined branch or sub-species of a cultic
tradition, descended from 'ranters', 'levelers', and closely related
variants of dissident, ultra-protestant fanaticism".
It owes very little to philosophers and their model of reason, which is why the Enlightenment can be understood more as a religious event than a philosophical one.
Or, as Land notes, the world's ruling creed - radically democratic and egalitarian in character - is something that emerged amongst a specific people at a particular time and then spread "along identifiable historical and geographical pathways, with an
epidemic virulence that is disguised as progressive global enlightenment".
Land finds this all very amusing: "The unmasking of the modern 'liberal' intellectual [...] as a pale, fervent, narrowly doctrinaire puritan,
recognizably descended from the species of witch-burning zealots, is
reliably - and irresistibly - entertaining."
Not that he sees many others laughing; in fact, as the Cathedral extends and tightens its grip upon everyone everywhere, the response it triggers is often anything but humorous:
"More commonly, when unable to exact humble compliance, it encounters
inarticulate rage, or at least uncomprehending, smoldering resentment,
as befits the imposition of parochial cultural dogmas, still wrapped in
the trappings of a specific, alien pedigree, even as they earnestly
confess to universal rationality."
The Muslim world, for example, doesn't often stop to appreciate the irony of the situation. For them, Universalism is Western imperialism and they don't like it; they don't find the truths being foistered on them to be as self-evident as we do. "How could anybody who was not already a believer be expected to consent to such assumptions?", asks Land.
Of course, those sophisticated globalists of the Cathedral are embarrassed when obliged to admit that their progressive political agenda has a religious origin; they pride themselves on their secularism and desperately seek to direct attention away from "the ethnically specific, dogmatic creedal content at its core".
As Land writes in a brilliant line: "Paleo-puritanism must be
derided in order for neo-puritanism to flourish ..." [2]
II.
Obviously, I'm sympathetic to Land's neo-reactionary nominalism directed against the Cathedral and its project of Universal Enlightenment. In a sense, that's what the phrase torpedo the ark might be understood to mean; i.e., a rejection of the ideal fantasy that the entire human race might be caught up in single becoming: One World, One People, One Law.
I instinctively hate this line of thinking and always have.
One of the reasons that the notion of a dark enlightenment attracts is because it rejects the myth of progress (or the internal teleology) at work in the philosophy of those such as Kant and Hegel and opposes any attempt to centralise into oneness, encouraging rather what D. H. Lawrence would describe as "a vivid recoil into separateness" [3].
Notes
[1] Nick Land, the Dark Enlightenment (Imperium Books 2022). The essay, written in 2012, is also available online: click here. Note that I am quoting from the fourth and final part of this online version.
[2] Similarly, as Land goes on to note, neofascists of the New World Order can't be vocal
enough in condemning white nationalism and other forms of what they call
'far-right extremism':
"Just as the ratchet progress of neo-puritan social democracy is radically facilitated by the orchestrated pillorying of its embryonic religious forms, so is its trend to consistently neo-fascist political economy smoothed by the concerted repudiation of a 'neo-nazi' (or paleo-fascist) threat. It is extremely convenient, when constructing ever more nakedly corporatist or 'third position' structures of state-directed pseudo-capitalism, to be able to divert attention to angry expressions of white racial paranoia ..."
[3] D. H. Lawrence, ‘Future States’, in The Poems, ed. Cristopher Pollnitz (Cambridge University Press, 2013), p. 526.
Dark Enlightenment 1: On the Politics of Hate (4 July 2024): click here.
Dark Enlightenment 2: On Exiting the Present (5 July 2024): click here.
Dark Enlightenment 3: On the Zombie Apocalypse (5 July 2024): click here.
No comments:
Post a Comment