Although I don't think of myself as a blogger [1] - and although I don't regularly read any blogs - I appreciated a piece in The Guardian today by Simon Reynolds [2] which offered a nice defence of blogging as a genre ...
Whilst conceding that blogging is an outdated format and that many blog posts often go unread, Reynolds nevertheless celebrates the freedom that this type of text allows, enabling the writer to ramble and discuss any subject that captures their interest.
He writes:
"Blogging, for me, is the perfect format. No restrictions when it comes
to length or brevity: a post can be a considered and meticulously
composed 3,000-word essay, or a spurted splat of speculation or whimsy.
No rules about structure or consistency of tone."
Continuing:
"A blogpost can be
half-baked and barely proved [...] Purely for my own pleasure, I do often
go deep. But it's nearer the truth to say that some posts are outcomes
of rambles across the archives of the internet, byproducts of the odd
information trawled up and the lateral connections created. [...] When blogging, I can meander, take short
cuts and trespass in fields where I don't belong. Because I’m not
pitching an idea to a publication or presenting my credentials as an
authority, I am able to tackle subjects outside my expertise."
You can also discuss topics that are no longer topical: "An old record or TV programme you've stumbled on, or simply remembered ..." For in an atemporal culture, past, present and future are collapsed and one can even be nostalgic about the latter.
Reynolds also refers to the compulsive nature of blog writing; analogous to an excoriation disorder, or an itch one has to scratch, as he puts it. There's certainly some truth in that - as there is in the idea that long term bloggers have an obsessive character and the fanatic determination to carry on regardless; "I can’t imagine stopping blogging - even once there are just a few of us still standing."
I've been posting work on Torpedo the Ark for over ten years, but Reynolds has been blogging for twice as long [3], so I certainly respect him for that, knowing as I do the amount of time and effort that goes into producing content on a regular basis.
I also respect Reynolds for the fact that he (like me) would continue writing and publishing posts even if they had no audience at all. For amassing followers and forming some kind of community isn't what it's about; "connectivity was only ever part of the appeal".
Nor is generating an income from one's work a real concern:
"Freedom and doing it for free go together. I've resisted the idea of going the Substack or newsletter route. If I were to become conscious of having a subscriber base, I'd start trying to please them. And blogging should be the opposite of work."
Precisely ... Well said that man!
Notes
[1] See 'Post 2000: From Journal to Mémoire' (4 Jan 2023), wherein I explain how I view Torpedo the Ark (it's not a blog) and myself as a writer (I'm not a blogger): click here.
[2] Simon Reynolds, 'I'll never stop blogging: it's an itch I have to scratch - and I don’t care if it's an outdated format', The Guardian (26 Dec 2023): click here. All quotes in the above post are from this article.
[3] Torpedo the Ark began in November 2012. Reynolds began his blogging career in 2002, having operated a website for about six years prior to that date. He posts work today across several blogs, but his primary outlet is blissblog, the motto of which - My brain thinks blog-like - is one I wish I'd thought of.