The controversial case of Rachel Dolezal continues to fascinate and to challenge many of our ideas and misconceptions concerning race and the cultural construction of identity.
Ms Dolezal, according to her parents, is a white woman of predominantly European descent who has been wilfully misrepresenting and disguising herself as an African American in order to advance her career and rise to a position of prominence within the black community. For not only did she become a university professor of African studies, specialising in the intersection of gender, race and class, but also president of her local NAACP.
To be fair, Dolezal grew up in a family with adopted black siblings and attended a school in Mississippi where most of her friends and fellow pupils were black. She also married (and subsequently divorced) a black man with whom she has a child. But, of course, none of this serves to make her African American - anymore than does the deep-tanned skin, the clothing, the jewellery, or the make-up and hairstyling. Biologically speaking, she remains what she has always been: a white woman.
But since when has race ever simply been a question of biology?
But since when has race ever simply been a question of biology?
Thus, I have to admit I'm sympathetic to Dolezal and know precisely what she means when she suggests that her case is far more complex and multi-layered than many of her critics (or her parents) understand or wish to concede. This includes, for example, that great paragon of sensitive and sophisticated commentary, Piers Morgan, who brands Dolezal a lying, deluded idiot and is clearly outraged by the thought that race might be reconfigured as a question of style rather than blood and the fear that other essential binaries might in this manner also be problematized.
For Morgan - and he explicitly says as much - race is an either/or issue: you're either black or you're white. And Dolezal is 100% white by birth and breeding and can never be anything but white. Morgan thus brands her carefully crafted and performed identity fraudulent and a mockery; akin to wearing blackface. It would be laughable, he says, were it not so serious, concluding that Dolezal has "committed an appalling act of deception that deserves every heap of abuse now raining down on her head".
Of course, what those such as Morgan really wish us to understand is not that Dolezal is who and what she is no matter what she does, but that we are all born into fixed and fatal identities, regardless of what we learn, accomplish, or become in later life. And this would even include Barack Obama: he might be living in the White House and be the son of a white mother, but, according to those for whom race is an all-determining absolute, he remains a nigger for all eternity.
In other words, racism begins and ends with a form of death sentence; the belief that colour is so much more than merely skin-deep and blackness entirely unrelated to artifice.
Back in the news this week (now flogging 'skin-tone' face masks on zazzle.com) following the antics of the sacked former history professor Jessica Krug (aka 'Jess La Bombalera'!), who represents the latest, self-diagnosed lunatic academic's attempt to pursue a one-woman career that's one step up - or possibly down - from the Black and White Minstrel Show.
ReplyDeleteIn fact, Piers Morgan is hardly a lone voice of critique in this domain, as Krug's credibility has been written off by her university, colleagues and peers alike, all of whom seem strangely unanimous that pretending you're an Afro-Puerto Rican to build your career when you're actually a white Jew from suburban Kansas City makes you an embarrassment to your profession.
But don't take my word for it - in an attempt to win for herself a spurious prize for exemplary self-flagellation, Krug herself now proclaims herself a 'culture leech' who wishes to 'cancel' herself. Meanwhile, her contrastingly uncontrite sister in 'transracial' arms, Ms Dolezal, has apparently - and one might thing symbolically - only been offered work in pornography and reality TV since her demise, and now lives off food stamps.
* Readers who may wish to scrutinise Dolezal's behaviour live on camera and draw their own conclusions may care to view the embedded video in the below Guardian article:
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/feb/25/rachel-dolezal-not-going-stoop-apologise-grovel