1 Oct 2021

Hello Darkness My Old Friend ...

Hello darkness, my old friend - by Niranjan Morkar
 
 
I. 
 
The three fundamental laws of logic - (i) the law of non-contradiction; (ii) the law of the excluded middle; and (iii) the principle of identity - are all well and good, but cannot be thought valid for all forms of thinking. 
 
Why? Because - whether our logicians like to admit it or not - some forms of thinking rely upon creative madness and daimonic inspiration and so are not regulated by reason alone. 
 
Our very greatest poets, for example, playfully affirm paradox, ambiguity, and what Barthes terms the pleasure of the text; they are unafraid of appearing inconsistent or irrational and are proud to proclaim that if, like Whitman, they contradict themselves that's fine with them (for they contain multitudes) [1].        

 
II. 
 
Similarly, our great poet-philosophers, like Heidegger, argue that even the most enlightened thinking requires darkness: 
 
"This darkness is perhaps in play for all thinking at all times. Humans cannot set it aside. Rather they must learn to acknowledge the dark as something unavoidable and to keep at bay those prejudices that would destroy the lofty reign of the dark. Thus the dark remains distinct from the pitch black as the mere and utter absence of light. The dark however is the secret of the light. The dark keeps the light to itself. The latter belongs to the former. Thus the dark has its own limpidity." [2] 
 
This dark limpidity of thinking, is something that must always be protected. However, it's hard to do so when everything is now lit up with electric lights and we aspire to an ideal of excessive brightness that is brighter than a thousand suns.
 
As Heidegger says:   
 
"The light is no longer an illuminated clearing, when the light diffuses into a mere brightness [...] It remains difficult [...] to keep at bay the admixture of the brightness that does not belong and to find the brightness that is alone fitting to the dark. [...] Mortal thinking must let itself down into the dark depths of the well if it is to see the stars by day. It remains more difficult to guard the limpidity of the dark than to procure a brightness that only wants to shine as such. What only wants to shine, does not illuminate. [3]
 
In sum: whenever you start to think about thinking, you are instantly transported into darkness ...
 
 
Notes
 
[1] See Walt Whitman, Song of Myself, 51: click here to read on poets.org.  
 
[2] Martin Heidegger, Basic Principles of Thinking (Freiburg Lectures, 1957), in Bremen and Freiburg Lectures, trans. Andrew J. Mitchell, (Indiana University Press, 2012), p. 88.
 
[3] Ibid., pp. 88-89. 
 
 
This post (as promised) is for Jenina Bas Pendry. 
 
For a sister post to this one, click here.


2 comments:

  1. 'We turn from the light to see' - Don Paterson ('The Book of Shadows'). Sympathetic readers might also care to consult A. Alvarez' superb 'Night' regarding the catastrophic extensions of electric lighting for the creative unconscious. We are naturally frightened of the dark, and this sharpens our love of both poetry and children (to whom we read, in large part, to assuage both their and our fear).

    ReplyDelete
  2. on the one hand, an interesting anti-Platonic figure this Heideggerian groping in the dark; on the other perhaps a provocation (however inadvertent) to read the cave in a new light.

    ReplyDelete